• Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.

''SoloSG''

Ersiin

Platinum
Joined
Jun 13, 2014
Messages
401
Reaction score
62
There are a few things I would like to address:

"Another leaderboards was not required"

- Back when we introduced the idea of Solo SG, we asked around to see if people would prefer separate leaderboards, or include the Solo SG statistics in the current one. The majority voted for separate leaderboards.

"Everybody worked for their stats and now MCSG ruins them again"

- How exactly are we ruining your old statistics by implementing separate leaderboards? Since they are not being counted towards your total amount of games played or games won, I don't see how they would ruin anything in particular. This was one of the main reasons why people vouched for separate leaderboards, to save their current statistics.

"...because I don't wanna start my stats again from 0/0"

- Since it's a new game mode, it's only normal that everyone will start with 0/0 games. You keep all the wins you gained on (Team) SG and any future games you play on there will still be counted and added to your total. Any games you play on Solo SG will be added into your statistics on the new leaderboards. So in no way do these two conflict with one another.
Okey.
 

Date

Peacekeeper
Joined
Jun 2, 2015
Messages
318
Reaction score
2,443
Solosg is full of tryhards. Everyone nearly has full iron off spawn. If it's a 12 player game atleast remove some chests off spawn or make it 24 player.
 

colterisepic

Platinum
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
148
Reaction score
58
I use SoloSG to warm up because I don't care about my stats on there. If SoloSG and MCSG shared the same LB it would be unfair/unbalanced. This would also take out the use of regular SG unless it is for a CB or Scrim/Teaming. This would Ruin the competitive nature of the MCSG community.
 

MultiBigTime

Experienced
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
422
Reaction score
115
Everyone has there own opinions in life, if you like it you will play it. If you don't like it, you don't halve to play it simple. ;)
 

BedIntruder

Experienced
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
355
Reaction score
249
after reading about it, I do think that 24 player would be better, since 12 player makes it easier to boost/"team" (not effectively)
 

ArgaJones

Peacekeeper
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
1,055
Reaction score
683
It's actually great. I never knew how much i died to teams, until i played solo sg.
 

Beardy

District 13
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
4,648
Reaction score
3,847
I tried it, but it was really annoying having to wait until there were 2 people when I was expecting a 3 man deathmatch. I understand why it was done, but since this is not SGClassic, it should stick to what's been popular and working for so long.
 

colterisepic

Platinum
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
148
Reaction score
58
It's actually great. I never knew how much i died to teams, until i played solo sg.
I also realized how solosg has made the number of teams per game in regular sg go up because lots of the solo players on solo sg.
 

Beardy

District 13
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
4,648
Reaction score
3,847
I also realized how solosg has made the number of teams per game in regular sg go up because lots of the solo players on solo sg.
So use some sick moves and burn them all. It's the purest way to die, and easiest way to kill a team.
 

Electrix

Peacekeeper
Joined
Aug 31, 2014
Messages
1,813
Reaction score
1,269
I also realized how solosg has made the number of teams per game in regular sg go up because lots of the solo players on solo sg.
Actually, I haven't really noticed an increase in teams. One thing my clan does is join a solo SG and just FFA like they would have to do inevitably in normal SG anyway. I hope other large teams do this as well. :)
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
242,193
Messages
2,449,633
Members
523,972
Latest member
Atasci