What would you consider a good W/L ratio

[endthebean]

I think Leafybluetea has the best w/l ratio

 

[Qualia]

I'd say anything above 33% is pretty good, I mean come on, winning a third of your games is not bad at all!

I win about 45% of my games and can safely say that I'm a a relatively skilled player, however, I wouldn't consider a w/l ratio under 50% as amazing.

Honestly, I think it's the active w/l ratio that counts; look at Elgoldo for example, he wins over 85% of his games (although that isn't amazing as it seems since he only plays 3/4 maps which he is almost guaranteed a win on).

Some players will have an overall w/l ratio of under 20% but that could be because they started off terrible and only just became able to win the majority of their games.

This is why we need monthly leaderboards.

Anyway, I'm pretty content with my 45% w/l ratio

 

[ScrewYouGumby2]

No, alt accounts just have an incredible advantage over normal players, as they don't have to play 500+ games to start getting wins regularly

That is a decent point, but 70%?

Can you get on teamspeak soon? I have to leave in a while, I don't know if you want to talk today or not.

 

[Torchy // aezlurr]

You probably leave a lobby when you see someone who is even remotely good.

I dont.

 

[BlueHeron]

40% and up, and I'll consider the player good. But I also take other things into account such as win count.

 

[jamesyk2]

I have 18% and I thought that was good.... you people are pros :O

 

[FuSioN]

Mine's like 25% which is kinda bad.

 

[polarisXD]

I have a 36% ratio on my main(and only) account.

 

[BlitzCometITU]

Mine is like 9% because my internet can't handle getting TP'd to DeathMatch -.-

 

[darkai202]

I have a 30% w/l due to terrible Internet and playing on Singapore servers which generally got me 700-1000 MS.

Since MCSGv2 I got around a 40% w/l (I still crashed.. Just not as much, maybe 1/5 games) so I'd say I win around 40% of my games which I consider decent.

 

[MahxiXBL]

I'd say anything above 33% is pretty good, I mean come on, winning a third of your games is not bad at all!

I win about 45% of my games and can safely say that I'm a a relatively skilled player, however, I wouldn't consider a w/l ratio under 50% as amazing.

Honestly, I think it's the active w/l ratio that counts; look at Elgoldo for example, he wins over 85% of his games (although that isn't amazing as it seems since he only plays 3/4 maps which he is almost guaranteed a win on).

Some players will have an overall w/l ratio of under 20% but that could be because they started off terrible and only just became able to win the majority of their games.

This is why we need monthly leaderboards.

Anyway, I'm pretty content with my 45% w/l ratio

My w/l is quite bad but I'm still better than Issac Anyone can recover from a bad start! (I stil luv u Issac bby)

 

[Qualia]

My w/l is quite bad but I'm still better than Issac Anyone can recover from a bad start! (I stil luv u Issac bby)

Oh you wish m8, I peak 50 fps on tiny and still do better than you