SuperxAndrew
District 13
- Joined
- May 24, 2012
- Messages
- 1,318
- Reaction score
- 2,528
The rambling had good points. xDPersonally, I'd rather no maps to be taken out. I actually have great memories on some of these maps and I feel like others do also.
I feel as though the voting system takes out the need for maps to be taken off since if a map is not popular, it'll be played less. A map will win the vote if the majority of the players want to play that map. Taking off maps wouldn't make (almost) anyone happy since everyone has a different opinion on maps.
Whenever a new map is added, it is really fun to play it. I seriously don't think I would mind if 100 maps were on the server. The more the merrier. Although, if we were to have that many maps, we would need a system to dedicate certain maps to certain servers. ;-;
I'm going to go ahead and stop now; I'm completely rambling xD
I think that it is completely realistic to imagine the servers with 100 maps. However, it would need to be 100 solid maps. The problem I see with this is many maps not being enjoyed.
Just think, the majority of maps on the servers aren't popular. There are only a handful of maps that are played so regularly that they could be presumed popular, and this is with less than 50 maps. Imagine doubling the amount of maps MCSG has... it would theoretically double the amount of good maps, but also the bad.
Basically what I am trying to say it, yes, more the merrier is definitely a valid point; however, in order for MCSG to find 100 good maps is unrealistic. I think it is more realistic for MCSG to focus between 30-40 (in the post I said 10-20, but I think the 30-40 range is more ideal after reading other people's comments) maps that are all popular, get rid of the maps that cause clutter, and set a real standard of quality for the map making community.