Who do you think is the best MCSG player?

[Jackthepwnzor]

Your reason is?

I don't have one.

 

[CAmadeusA]

Nope. I judge who's a pro based on how many people have that many points. If a lot of people suddenly have 5000, my standards will rise.

Also, sometimes, being a pro can be about other things...chest routes, tactics, etc. Even if someone is easy to beat in a fight, that doesn't mean they "suck" at MCSG.

You are correct, but people who are generally easier to kill generally have less points/wins which is what matters For me, I go by who's pro and who isnt by who I can/cannot kill majority of the time.

 

[G33ke]

Edited my last post a bit by the way.

 

[toby22]

Long ago, in a galaxy far far away...

Dude dis zis not straw warz diz iz MCSG

 

[toby22]

I don't have one.

You can't judge me then bro

 

[Jackthepwnzor]

Dude dis zis not straw warz diz iz MCSG

IDC khgdsfhdxg hjgfjhgdsgl;jdskgjh

 

[Jackthepwnzor]

You can't judge me then bro

Yes I can.

 

[Nadarekyle]

Well, plenty of good players bounty off all their points after each round, so I'm not sure that's an accurate method of judging whether someone's a "pro" either...

 

[toby22]

Well, plenty of good players bounty off all their points after each round, so I'm not sure that's an accurate method of judging whether someone's a "pro" either...

Yeah it should be based off wins

 

[Jackthepwnzor]

I look at people's points, seeing they have 1858763278365 something, I'm like, they might be good, so I check their records....sometimes I find 7 wins..

 

[Nadarekyle]

Yeah it should be based off wins

Well, that's not accurate either. Wins can be accumulated over a period of time against 23 noobs.

 

[toby22]

Well, that's not accurate either. Wins can be accumulated over a period of time against 23 noobs.

Then what should it be based off of?!?!?!?