Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.
If everyone starts with zero, how isn't that fair? Literally everyone is at the same level. That's the definition of fair. And only one or two people are going to get easy rides. Besides that, I think people genuinely want to give other's a shot at actually getting somewhere decent. The leaderboards have been pretty static for awhile now.
No I mean it'd be the most fair to keep it as it is because we all started at zero. It's unfair to a whole bunch of players to get their stats reset and are forced to start at zero again. But whatever anyways, my replies have been deleted for absolutely no reason on this thread so I'm done here.
So it's totally fair if underrated people like Volcomort and DayDuskDawn never get their shot at being in the top 100 because everyone else has been able to rack up such a ridiculous amount of wins? I agree with Theoretical (and NOT just because my stats are horrible
).
But we all started at zero at different times. That's not exactly fair. :3
Kind and loving....I want some of this kindness and love. If I had to say who's been the friendliest to me since my return, I'd have to say it's been Bcuzimbored1243 , Tzazon , and Saydimon . Well that and Huahwi and I actually had a short but surprisingly civil conversation of pokes on Teamspeak the other day. Who knows? Maybe I'll eventually forgive him for "gg l2p"ing me on CA. ;-;Well I just joined the community today and I find it great and amazing, the staff seem nice and people are so kind and loving, I really hope it won't die
Well everyone has been through things in the past and since I'm new I didn't surface any of that negative actions from others, So I guess I didn't feel what it's really like
Yes that's exactly fair in my eyes. I worked my way up so should they. The only real good reason I'd vote yes is the new leaderboards however I just feel like most people are voting for themselves, I guess including myself, rather than MCSG.So it's totally fair if underrated people like Volcomort and DayDuskDawn never get their shot at being in the top 100 because everyone else has been able to rack up such a ridiculous amount of wins? I agree with Theoretical (and NOT just because my stats are horrible
What's your point? The fact is that we all did infact start with zero wins. Even with new leaderboards you're going to get new players who start with zero after you've built up wins. Is that fair for them? Yes it is. I'm sorry but saying that people starting later is unfair, no it's not.
Yes it fair, why is it not fair? I worked my way up, why can't they? If they're great at the game they'll get recognised, of course it's easier to be recognised at the top but the people at the top have worked to be at the top. If they want to be known then they can work to be at the top. Like I, and many others did.So it's totally fair if underrated people like Volcomort and DayDuskDawn never get their shot at being in the top 100 because everyone else has been able to rack up such a ridiculous amount of wins? I agree with Theoretical (and NOT just because my stats are horrible
Not only him.
